Economic Crisis of Pakistan & West’s Involvement
Economic Crisis:
Islamabad: IFIs share a commonality in their practice of ensnaring and exploiting countries, while assigning responsibility for such exploitation to external factors.
IMF Program:
Businesses abide by an unspoken principle, and they diligently adhere to it. A well-established truth is that numerous countries have collapsed while undergoing an IMF program of restructuring.
While the economies of Latin America are frequently cited as an example, more recent instances such as Hungary and Greece demonstrate the devastating consequences of IMF-led reform policies in Europe.
Hungarian Govt.:
After entering into an IMF agreement, Hungary was required to implement austerity measures, including cuts to pension benefits, wage freezes, and deficit reduction. These actions had a significant impact on social welfare programs and provoked public outcry against the government, yet the IMF remained unperturbed.
However, when the Hungarian government attempted to alleviate poverty by introducing a banking transaction tax, the IMF vehemently opposed the move and suspended its cooperation.
Greece, despite implementing various IMF and European institution-led policies, has failed to identify a viable long-term solution to its economic struggles.
Like many other developing countries, Pakistan is also a victim of the debt trap, experiencing high inflation, a declining rupee, reduced production, and cuts to social welfare spending under the direction of IFIs.
Rather than taking responsibility for their actions, IFIs seek to blame China and make it a scapegoat for their errors.
China-Pakistan:
Opponents of the China-Pakistan relationship and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) find it as an excellent opportunity to exploit the situation. They have begun smear campaigns and are tagging the bad economic situation of Pakistan with CPEC and Chinese investment.
The statement can be qualified from actions of the US and India as both are fierce opponents of CPEC and the China-Pakistan relationship.
It is an open secret that the US has been pushing Pakistan for a long time to quit CPEC and the BRI. It is part of the US policy to contain China and check its peaceful rise. To achieve the objective, the US is pressurizing Pakistan one way or the other.
First, Pakistan was put in the grey list of FATF with the objective of squeezing its economic space. Second, the IFIs are playing their role to pile on pressure. Third, the US has allocated hundreds of millions of dollars to run a campaign against China and CPEC.
Through the COMPETE Act, Washington has reserved $500 million for media to keep a close watch on China and the BRI including CPEC.
On the other hand, India is also trying to step in to sabotage CPEC. It is spreading false rumors about Chinese personnel and its embassy in Pakistan.
An analysis of events in recent decades reveals that the current economic crisis has stemmed from two main factors – IFIs (which have been discussed above) and the war on terror.
The war on terror has undermined Pakistan’s standing in the global arena and its security situation. Although Pakistan did not want to become part of the war, the US and the West forced it to become a frontline ally.
Owing to the war, the country suffered huge losses on all fronts such as the economic crisis, security situation, social sector and human life. It had to bear an economic loss of $150 billion, which is beyond the country’s capacity. It is higher than the current external debt of $130 billion.
On the other hand, Pakistan lost 70,000 precious lives. Hundreds of thousands are still suffering from the psychological effects and many people have become handicapped.
Unfortunately, the allies did not acknowledge the sacrifices of Pakistan. Rather they started erecting hurdles and are even not hesitating to kill economic and development opportunities, like those provided by CPEC, by propagating conspiracy theories and pushing the country into a debt trap.
It is quite unfortunate, but not unexpected. Instead of supporting economic growth and development, they are busy undermining the potential.
CPEC data clearly shows it is helping Pakistan to mitigate problems and is sprouting economic crisis, livelihood and development opportunities. For example, it has helped to create 92,000 direct jobs in the first phase.
Moreover, 100+ small and medium enterprises (SMEs) have benefited from CPEC and created many employment avenues. As a result of the gigantic project, Pakistan has also been able to rein in load-shedding and save $4-5 billion annually.
Contrary to the debt trap conspiracies, data shows that the contribution of CPEC programs to the national debt is $5.7 billion, which is only 4.5% of the total external debt.
An overwhelming majority of CPEC projects are investment projects. Moreover, the debt under CPEC is productive in nature. It means it is generating economic activities and livelihood opportunities.
On the other side, the debt outside of CPEC stands at around $24 billion. A major chunk of it is in the form of currency swap or deposits to shore up the foreign currency reserves of Pakistan.
Apart from that, China has provided debt to Pakistan in a dire situation, when the allies and IFIs had abandoned it.
IFIs, the US and the West may not change their mindset and practices and they believe they have the right to say whatever they want. So, Pakistan and China should establish mechanisms to counter such campaigns and allegations. To achieve the objective, the two friendly neighbors must adopt a proactive policy, rather than a reactive policy, which will not help.
Published in The Logical baat, February 20th, 2023.
